( – promoted by Colorado Pols)
TAXPAYERS WIND UP PAYING LAMBORN DONOR
Excerpt from The Colorado Springs GAZETTE
Page A-3 March 8, 2008
Rep. Doug Lamborn paid $40,000 in taxpayer money for constituent services to a consultant who’s donated $2,000 to his election campaigns.
Curt Cerveny, an owner of Denver-based Politically Direct, which “is in the business of winning elections,” its Web site says, gave Lamborn $1,000 during the 2006 election cycle and $1,000 on Nov. 11 for his reelection campaign.
Politically Direct was paid to conduct electronic town hall meetings for Lamborn starting last year and continuing through this month.
Cerveny said there was no quid pro quo, although he said he’s provided the same service to other Congress members and didn’t contribute to their campaigns. He said he planned to do so soon, however.
Lamborn’s communications director Kristen Hainen said Lamborn conducted six or seven tele-town halls this year but didn’t know how many in 2007.
Cerveny said his firm handled about eight calls for Lamborn in 2007 and 2008. Politically Direct was paid $5,049 on June 26 for “telecommunications charges,” House records of Lamborn’s expenses show.
Cerveny said he also has earned about $35,000 that hasn’t shown up on Lamborn’s disbursements statement.Hainen said the calls are an electronic version of “franking,” a taxpayer-funded mailing privilege used by Congress to communicate with constituents about federal issues.
Lamborn has been criticized for using frank mail, on which he spent $68,068 in the first three quarters of 2007, House records show.Hainen said the phone messages and the numbers to be called “have to go through franking (oversight) to make sure it’s factual and it adheres to the franking guidelines and that it’s a constituent contact.”
Cerveny said Politically Direct handles electronic franking for other members of Congress and said 85 percent of federal lawmakers conduct tele-town hall meetings.
Here’s how they work: Politically Direct buys registered voter lists from vendors who got them from county election officials of the 5th District’s six counties. Those records are then compared with other records to develop a phone list.
Thousands of voters are called and invited to listen to Lamborn talk about federal issues from his Washington, D.C., office. If listeners have a question, they press *3, and a screener asks for the question, which is posted on a computer screen for Lamborn to read and answer. Listeners can hang up anytime during the one-hour meetings.
Cerveny said Lamborn has reached up to 200,000 voters using tele-town hall meetings, and that the average voter listens for six to seven minutes.
He said the government’s franking office can audit calls to verify that Republican, Democrat and unaffiliated voters are contacted.“If we were ever audited on it, we could prove it,” Cerveny said. “The last thing you want to do is get cross-wise with the federal government. A lot of Democrats have gotten calls from Lamborn,” who’s a Republican.
Cerveny said there’s no connection between his campaign contributions to Lamborn and Lamborn’s hiring him.
“When I gave Doug his first check (in 2006), I didn’t have the service to offer him,” he said. “After that, I brought this to his attention as something he could use. He was gracious to give it to a Colorado firm. To be consistent to what I had donated before, I gave him another $1,000 contribution (in November 2007).
“Was it a quid pro quo? I don’t think that’s a fair connection one way or another,” he said. “I think he still would have considered us, because we’re the only Colorado vendor that does this.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Dems Save The Day, Government To Stay Open
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Weld County Gerrymandering Case Pushes The Boundaries Of Home Rule
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: bullshit!
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
of the worst kind. Padding the pockets of your friends to campaign for you on the taxpayers dime.
This firm gave no money to Doug Lamborn. The owners support Doug’s politics and gave $1000.00 in 2006, and again this year.
Doug Lamborn uses this firm for a variety of things, including the new electronic town hall many politicians of both parties are using across the nation. This is the only local Colorado firm providing the service.
No Big Deal !!!!
Definition:
How can Doug spending taxpayer money on his friends to benefit his relection not be understood as anything but pork? Oh right, it is! Of the worst kind.
This is not a violation. This is a political supporter giving a contribution to the candidate who matches his politics.
There is no payment from the company. Just a donation from an owner. No correlation between a $1000.00 contribution made in 2006, with any prohibited transaction. The campaign used this supplier. The Congressional office used this same Colorado supplier for different services. Both for legitimate and understandable reasons not associated with contributions.
This is just another political potshot from the most liberal reporter the Gazette has had in the last 20 years. Isn’t this the same crowd that tried to claim Lamborn sold out for a $250.00 Earmark just a few weeks ago? Except Mark Udall and Ken Salazar also recommended and co-sponsored the Earmark for the Colorado business. Even Boulder Liberals didn’t buy that any US Congressman would sell out for $250.00. See Press Concludes Lamborn did not sell out voters for a $250.00 contribution
http://coloradopols.com/showDi…
What do you expect, a computer cross check for every contribution that comes in to see if anyone on the Congressman’s staff ever ate at the restaurant the contributor co-owns, or bought office supplies or toner from the donor’s brother in law?
When a Colorado Republican is found with a refrigerator full of over $96,000.00 in cash, or if it turns out the services were priced significantly above the market rate, then we’ll talk. Till then, its just campaign gotcha.
Pretty scandalous.
the politician needs to be like Caesar’s wife – beyond reproach.
It was either a quid-pro-quo or Lamborn was incredibly stupid.
Your boy is totally a fan of the pork my friend.
your ridiculous accusations against an honest politician. I am busy watching a real political criminal on TV, the re-run of Elliot Spitzer’s resignation speech. Please leave a message.
participated once
I got to ask my question in real time.
I expected a tape delay.